| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
< PRODIGY LIVE ~ Wednesday 18 November 2015 Ziggo Dome, Amsterdam |
|||
|
|||
 General Posts: 1113Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:05 am
|
|
||
| Top |
  
|
||
|
|||
 Captain Posts: 681Location: EstoniaJoined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:20 pm
|
Liam please put it on the next ep
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 Prodigious ArabPosts: 4204Location: The Dark SideJoined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:22 pm
|
Nightmare wrote: Proof plase? (pm bacause of offtopic) PM SENT.
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 2917Location: italyJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 3:44 pm
|
sorry guys, i didn't notice it was already mentioned. Anyway it's ok, what is important is that we all know it.
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
| Prodigious ArabPosts: 4204Location: The Dark SideJoined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:22 pm
|
nucleartitan wrote: sorry guys, i didn't notice it was already mentioned. Anyway it's ok, what is important is that we all know it. Already mentioned but no one pointed out the sample. You did a great job  
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 6514Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:44 am
|
mouzz wrote: Harbinger wrote: mouzz wrote: Public Enemy without Chuck D but with a terrible soundmix, painful. Why no Chuck D? We joked that he might have smoked to much weed being in Amsterdam but he said on twitter that he had to go back to the US to take care of some legal issues. Thanks, missed it on twitter
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 2881Location: ESTJoined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:30 pm
|
UN wrote: thats old school in excellent new school dressing. beats are massive! tho wouldn't hope too much. it's too old to be released by Liam's principles.
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 A.K.A. feelxPosts: 3056Location: Montréal, QCJoined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:32 pm
|
Elsewhere wrote: it's too old to be released by Liam's principles. what principles releasing 10 year old songs like Destroy and Heatwave (Rebel Radio), he doesn't have any principles AFAIK
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 Corporal Posts: 369Location: FranceJoined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:21 am
|
feelthy wrote: releasing 10 year old songs like Destroy what
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
| GeneralPosts: 2881Location: ESTJoined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:30 pm
|
feelthy wrote: Elsewhere wrote: it's too old to be released by Liam's principles. what principles releasing 10 year old songs like Destroy and Heatwave (Rebel Radio), he doesn't have any principles AFAIK hmm, if u put it like that... then indeed.. but as far as i know, usually, what is discarded is discarded forever. imagine he releases it, what's going to be next, no souvenirs? :D
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 Lieutenant Posts: 574Location: GermanyJoined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:38 am
|
Destroy is from 2009 although still quite surprising we got that, I agree.
The only thing Rebel Radio and Heatwave have in common is the melody / synth that kicks in during breakdown lol.. entirely different tracks apart from that. |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 3823Location: USAJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 6:56 pm
|
Liam has always reused abandoned bits of old tracks or reworked them into something else.
Hell, he's reused RELEASED tracks' material in new songs. Folks are really complaining? Bits of unused "Trigger" showed up in the Oasis remix Destroy was reworked into something different Rebel Radio has ONE TINY LITTLE PART borrowed from Heatwave while the other 90% of the track was NEW He's allowed to use old, unreleased ideas in new music. Or are we going to ignore this entire album era where maybe 10% of the material was borrowed from old, unused stuff. We're gonna ignore the other 90% of brand new material??? Nitpickers
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
| ColonelPosts: 853Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:31 pm
|
Uh no one was complaining ?
Bak to school was from 1998 released in 2005 |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
| GeneralPosts: 2881Location: ESTJoined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:30 pm
|
i don't think anyone is complaining really, it's just so positively unexpected. things like happening are still rare
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
| GeneralPosts: 2917Location: italyJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 3:44 pm
|
Electronic_Punk® wrote: nucleartitan wrote: sorry guys, i didn't notice it was already mentioned. Anyway it's ok, what is important is that we all know it. Already mentioned but no one pointed out the sample. You did a great job Thank you
|
||
| Top |
|
||
All times are UTC
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Original 2.x design by Mike Lothar // Ported to 3.x by CiC and will_hough
Original 2.x design by Mike Lothar // Ported to 3.x by CiC and will_hough