| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
< PRODIGY NEWS ~ New Album "Invaders Must Die" On February 23rd |
|||
|
|||
 Prodigious ArabPosts: 4204Location: The Dark SideJoined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:22 pm
|
Prodigy will outsell them, wait and see
|
||
| Top |
 
|
||
|
|||
 General Posts: 1780Location: EnglandJoined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:06 pm
|
TRANS4MER wrote: Otis P Jivefunk wrote: If they do both release albums on the same day, no way will Prodigy beat U2. U2 will get the number 1. This is coming from someone who loves Prodigy and hates U2... okay so what's the issue here?? What's wrong if U2 sell more?? I don't mind - I love both bands so I am extremely happy that I will have 2 amazing albums at the same time - at time I'll be travelling so that'll be a great spring for me. but even if I hated U2 I wouldn't give a fuck if they sell more than The Prodigy - Invaders Must Die's gonna be a huga record so who cares if it sells the most or not - that won't affect its quality man! and I can't really understand you people saying that U2 are shite - even if they are not your favourite band or even worse it's really strange to say such a thing about a band which made songs like One, Where The Streets Have no Name, Sunday Bloody Sunday or Beautiful Day etc - it's sounds like if you say that Pink Floyd or Led Zeppelin or The Clash or Wu Tang Clan or Underworld suck - different type of music but all so influential and powerful I never said U2 are shite, I said fuck U2 and that I hate U2. Those are both opinions and not facts, not like someone saying something is shite as if to say they are factually right when they’re not. You’re suggesting I’m putting my opinions across in a factual matter, when quite clearly I’m not. As for the argument of who cares if U2 sell more. I’m not one to care about chart positions very much because they rarely reflect quality. But I would still be happier to see Prodigy’s successive string of number 1 albums starting from Music For The Jilted Generation continued rather than broken, especially by a band that I hate. I’m sure most people here don’t give a flying fuck about chart positions, yet at the same time they would still be quite happy to see Prodigy at number 1 again…
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 ColonelPosts: 972Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:10 am
|
well, there is absolutely no way that IMD will beat "no line on the horizon". it will be OUR no 1 album, and that's that.
u2 are NOT a fucking shite band. they make decent music over a couple of decades now. and like him or not - if bono is responsible for giving an african child enough food to make it one more year, he can do jumping jacks only wearing pink glasses in front of his press corps for all i care. |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 1265Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:00 pm
|
Prodigy can't compete with U2. The worldwide success and popularity of their mainstream music will always do well. Chart positions mean nothing.
I'd rather be in the prodigy shoes than U2, and thats not being biased as a fan.
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 1430Location: HungaryJoined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 7:04 pm
|
I don't f**in care about this U2 vs Prodigy shit.
As soon as i get the new stuff I wont do anything just listen to the new tracks and I wont look if The Prodigy has beat U2 or not. |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 Majestic 13Posts: 2641Location: RussiaJoined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:52 pm
|
is this the new logo of take me to the hospital label instead monkey ?
this frame reminds me cover of firestarter single
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 3702Location: Almere, The NetherlandsJoined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:54 pm
|
old news flame
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 ModeratorPosts: 4789Location: Wolverhampton, UKJoined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:52 pm
|
 bigger pic of it...
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 2007Location: NorwayJoined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:50 pm
|
Is the album only 40 minutes long??
come on Liam.. Why? 
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 2089Location: Melbourne, AustraliaJoined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 2:22 pm
|
MoozeBlaster wrote: Is the album only 40 minutes long??
come on Liam.. Why? a lot of prodigys songs drag out, spitfire was the worst and not even that long, better to get everything you can into the shortest time, id rather be able to play them over and over. |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
| Majestic 13Posts: 2641Location: RussiaJoined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:52 pm
|
StasZ wrote: old news flame
news ? it was question which i wanted to ask for a long time
thanx evans 
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
| GeneralPosts: 2007Location: NorwayJoined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:50 pm
|
warrior wrote: MoozeBlaster wrote: Is the album only 40 minutes long?? come on Liam.. Why? a lot of prodigys songs drag out, spitfire was the worst and not even that long, better to get everything you can into the shortest time, id rather be able to play them over and over. Yeah sure. But they could have put some more tunes on then.. 
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 2863Location: Bristol, UKJoined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:58 pm
|
MoozeBlaster wrote: warrior wrote: MoozeBlaster wrote: Is the album only 40 minutes long?? come on Liam.. Why? a lot of prodigys songs drag out, spitfire was the worst and not even that long, better to get everything you can into the shortest time, id rather be able to play them over and over. Yeah sure. But they could have put some more tunes on then.. hey, but i'd rather have quality over quantity. i dont think i could wait another year for a few more tracks to be on the album lol, waitin this long is killing me! haha 
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 6557Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:44 am
|
MoozeBlaster wrote: Is the album only 40 minutes long??
come on Liam.. Why? 42 mins with the 11 tracks |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
| Prodigious ArabPosts: 4204Location: The Dark SideJoined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:22 pm
|
Harbinger wrote: MoozeBlaster wrote: Is the album only 40 minutes long?? come on Liam.. Why? 42 mins with the 11 tracks how do you know? |
||
| Top |
|
||
All times are UTC
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Original 2.x design by Mike Lothar // Ported to 3.x by CiC and will_hough
Original 2.x design by Mike Lothar // Ported to 3.x by CiC and will_hough